Compare ETFs

Compare holdings, allocations, classifications, and performance.

Showing cached reports.

AOM: generated Aug 1, 2026, 12:38 AM (as of 2026-07-30); PWZ: generated Jul 31, 2026, 10:34 PM (as of 2026-07-30).

Signed out: the comparison includes up to 10 holdings per ETF. Sign in to compare more holdings.

AOM vs PWZ

Current snapshot · Current snapshot

Portfolio statistics

AOM

Largest holding: IUSB · 49.71%
Top 10 concentration: 100.02%
Gross exposure: 100.02%
Net exposure: 100.00%

PWZ

Largest holding: CASMED · 1.386%
Top 10 concentration: 5.396%
Gross exposure: 5.396%
Net exposure: 5.396%

Holdings overlap

Based on returned holdings.

ETF A

AOM

Snapshot: 2026-07-30
Returned holdings: 9
Largest position: IUSB · 49.71%

0.000%weighted overlap

ETF B

PWZ

Snapshot: 2026-07-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: CASMED · 1.386%

Holdings universe15 distinct mapped tickers in the returned rows

1 shared

Only AOM 8Shared 1Only PWZ 6

Largest allocation differences

IUSBISHARES CORE UNIV USD BOND ETF49.71% gap

49.71%0.000%

IVVISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST23.25% gap

23.25%0.000%

IDEVISHARES CORE MSCI INT DEVEL ETF11.76% gap

11.76%0.000%

IAGGiShares Core Intl Aggregate Bnd ET8.900% gap

8.900%0.000%

IEMGISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS4.330% gap

4.330%0.000%

CASMEDCalifornia Health Facilities Financing Authority1.386% gap

0.000%1.386%

IJHISHARES CORE S&P MID-CAP ETF1.316% gap

1.316%0.000%

UNVHGRRegents of the University of California Medical Center Pooled Revenue1.166% gap

0.000%1.166%

Portfolio composition

Based on classified holdings in the returned results.

No classification data available.

Valuation multiples

Weighted valuation multiples by ETF
Weighted multiple	AOM	PWZ
P/E	N/A0/9 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/B	N/A0/9 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/S	N/A0/9 valued	N/A0/10 valued

No valuation data available for these holdings.

Holdings details

View

Shared holdings

Sort by1

Ticker	Company	AOM weight	PWZ weight	Absolute difference
USD	USD CASH	-0.009%	0.409%	0.418%