Compare ETFs

Compare holdings, allocations, classifications, and performance.

Showing cached reports.

BAI: generated Aug 1, 2026, 1:45 PM (as of 2026-07-30); COWG: generated Aug 1, 2026, 4:42 PM (as of 2026-04-30).

Signed out: the comparison includes up to 10 holdings per ETF. Sign in to compare more holdings.

BAI vs COWG

Current snapshot · Historical snapshot

Portfolio statistics

BAI

Largest holding: MU · 6.519%
Top 10 concentration: 47.27%
Gross exposure: 47.27%
Net exposure: 47.27%

COWG

Largest holding: ONTO · 4.677%
Top 10 concentration: 28.28%
Gross exposure: 28.28%
Net exposure: 28.28%

Holdings overlap

Based on returned holdings.

ETF A

BAI

Snapshot: 2026-07-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: MU · 6.519%

4.435%weighted overlap

ETF B

COWG

Snapshot: 2026-04-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: ONTO · 4.677%

Holdings universe19 distinct mapped tickers in the returned rows

1 shared

Only BAI 9Shared 1Only COWG 9

Largest allocation differences

MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC6.519% gap

6.519%0.000%

AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC5.484% gap

5.484%0.000%

AVGOBROADCOM INC5.387% gap

5.387%0.000%

000660SK HYNIX INC5.161% gap

5.161%0.000%

NVDANVIDIA CORP5.006% gap

5.006%0.000%

TSMTAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING4.972% gap

4.972%0.000%

ONTOOnto Innovation Inc4.677% gap

0.000%4.677%

GOOGLALPHABET INC CLASS A3.604% gap

3.604%0.000%

Portfolio composition

Based on classified holdings in the returned results.

No classification data available.

Valuation multiples

Weighted valuation multiples by ETF
Weighted multiple	BAI	COWG
P/E	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/B	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/S	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued

No valuation data available for these holdings.

Holdings details

View

Shared holdings

Sort by1

Ticker	Company	BAI weight	COWG weight	Absolute difference
LRCX	LAM RESEARCH CORP	4.619%	4.435%	0.184%