Compare ETFs

Compare holdings, allocations, classifications, and performance.

Showing cached reports.

COWG: generated Aug 1, 2026, 4:42 PM (as of 2026-04-30); FTGS: generated Aug 1, 2026, 9:42 AM (as of 2026-07-31).

Signed out: the comparison includes up to 10 holdings per ETF. Sign in to compare more holdings.

COWG vs FTGS

Historical snapshot · Current snapshot

Portfolio statistics

COWG

Largest holding: ONTO · 4.677%
Top 10 concentration: 28.28%
Gross exposure: 28.28%
Net exposure: 28.28%

FTGS

Largest holding: MSFT · 2.310%
Top 10 concentration: 21.56%
Gross exposure: 21.56%
Net exposure: 21.56%

Holdings overlap

Based on returned holdings.

ETF A

COWG

Snapshot: 2026-04-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: ONTO · 4.677%

2.120%weighted overlap

ETF B

FTGS

Snapshot: 2026-07-31
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: MSFT · 2.310%

Holdings universe19 distinct mapped tickers in the returned rows

1 shared

Only COWG 9Shared 1Only FTGS 9

Largest allocation differences

ONTOOnto Innovation Inc4.677% gap

4.677%0.000%

LRCXLam Research Corp4.435% gap

4.435%0.000%

SCCOSouthern Copper Corp3.137% gap

3.137%0.000%

KLACKLA Corp2.981% gap

2.981%0.000%

UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corp2.515% gap

2.515%0.000%

MSFTMicrosoft Corporation2.310% gap

0.000%2.310%

GRMNGarmin Ltd.2.300% gap

0.000%2.300%

NEMNewmont Corp2.183% gap

2.183%0.000%

Portfolio composition

Based on classified holdings in the returned results.

No classification data available.

Valuation multiples

Weighted valuation multiples by ETF
Weighted multiple	COWG	FTGS
P/E	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/B	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/S	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued

No valuation data available for these holdings.

Holdings details

View

Shared holdings

Sort by1

Ticker	Company	COWG weight	FTGS weight	Absolute difference
MPWR	Monolithic Power Systems Inc	2.444%	2.120%	0.324%