Compare ETFs

Compare holdings, allocations, classifications, and performance.

Showing cached reports.

COWG: generated Aug 1, 2026, 4:42 PM (as of 2026-04-30); TDVG: generated Aug 1, 2026, 12:01 AM (as of 2026-06-30).

Signed out: the comparison includes up to 10 holdings per ETF. Sign in to compare more holdings.

COWG vs TDVG

Historical snapshot · Current snapshot

Portfolio statistics

COWG

Largest holding: ONTO · 4.677%
Top 10 concentration: 28.28%
Gross exposure: 28.28%
Net exposure: 28.28%

TDVG

Largest holding: AAPL · 5.414%
Top 10 concentration: 29.72%
Gross exposure: 29.72%
Net exposure: 29.72%

Holdings overlap

Based on returned holdings.

ETF A

COWG

Snapshot: 2026-04-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: ONTO · 4.677%

2.678%weighted overlap

ETF B

TDVG

Snapshot: 2026-06-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: AAPL · 5.414%

Holdings universe19 distinct mapped tickers in the returned rows

1 shared

Only COWG 9Shared 1Only TDVG 9

Largest allocation differences

AAPLApple5.414% gap

0.000%5.414%

ONTOOnto Innovation Inc4.677% gap

4.677%0.000%

LRCXLam Research Corp4.435% gap

4.435%0.000%

MSFTMicrosoft3.864% gap

0.000%3.864%

AVGOBroadcom3.677% gap

0.000%3.677%

SCCOSouthern Copper Corp3.137% gap

3.137%0.000%

JPMJPMorgan Chase3.084% gap

0.000%3.084%

VVisa2.734% gap

0.000%2.734%

Portfolio composition

Based on classified holdings in the returned results.

No classification data available.

Valuation multiples

Weighted valuation multiples by ETF
Weighted multiple	COWG	TDVG
P/E	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/B	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/S	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued

No valuation data available for these holdings.

Holdings details

View

Shared holdings

Sort by1

Ticker	Company	COWG weight	TDVG weight	Absolute difference
KLAC	KLA Corp	2.981%	2.678%	0.303%