Compare ETFs

Compare holdings, allocations, classifications, and performance.

Showing cached reports.

COWZ: generated Aug 1, 2026, 4:33 PM (as of 2026-04-30); OAKM: generated Aug 1, 2026, 8:13 AM (as of 2026-03-31).

Signed out: the comparison includes up to 10 holdings per ETF. Sign in to compare more holdings.

COWZ vs OAKM

Historical snapshot · Historical snapshot

Portfolio statistics

COWZ

Largest holding: QCOM · 2.670%
Top 10 concentration: 21.13%
Gross exposure: 21.13%
Net exposure: 21.13%

OAKM

Largest holding: COP · 5.228%
Top 10 concentration: 37.22%
Gross exposure: 37.22%
Net exposure: 37.22%

Holdings overlap

Based on returned holdings.

ETF A

COWZ

Snapshot: 2026-04-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: QCOM · 2.670%

2.167%weighted overlap

ETF B

OAKM

Snapshot: 2026-03-31
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: COP · 5.228%

Holdings universe19 distinct mapped tickers in the returned rows

1 shared

Only COWZ 9Shared 1Only OAKM 9

Largest allocation differences

PSXPhillips 664.352% gap

0.000%4.352%

TRGPTarga Resources Corp3.829% gap

0.000%3.829%

CCitigroup Inc3.720% gap

0.000%3.720%

CTVACorteva Inc3.437% gap

0.000%3.437%

STTState Street Corp3.424% gap

0.000%3.424%

WTWWillis Towers Watson PLC3.374% gap

0.000%3.374%

CRMSalesforce Inc3.333% gap

0.000%3.333%

MRKMerck & Co Inc3.274% gap

0.000%3.274%

Portfolio composition

Based on classified holdings in the returned results.

No classification data available.

Valuation multiples

Weighted valuation multiples by ETF
Weighted multiple	COWZ	OAKM
P/E	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/B	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/S	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued

No valuation data available for these holdings.

Holdings details

View

Shared holdings

Sort by1

Ticker	Company	COWZ weight	OAKM weight	Absolute difference
COP	ConocoPhillips	2.167%	5.228%	3.061%