Compare ETFs

Compare holdings, allocations, classifications, and performance.

Showing cached reports.

IXC: generated Jul 31, 2026, 6:37 AM (as of 2026-07-29); OAKM: generated Aug 1, 2026, 8:13 AM (as of 2026-03-31).

Signed out: the comparison includes up to 10 holdings per ETF. Sign in to compare more holdings.

IXC vs OAKM

Current snapshot · Historical snapshot

Portfolio statistics

IXC

Largest holding: XOM · 18.17%
Top 10 concentration: 58.46%
Gross exposure: 58.46%
Net exposure: 58.46%

OAKM

Largest holding: COP · 5.228%
Top 10 concentration: 37.22%
Gross exposure: 37.22%
Net exposure: 37.22%

Holdings overlap

Based on returned holdings.

ETF A

IXC

Snapshot: 2026-07-29
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: XOM · 18.17%

4.022%weighted overlap

ETF B

OAKM

Snapshot: 2026-03-31
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: COP · 5.228%

Holdings universe19 distinct mapped tickers in the returned rows

1 shared

Only IXC 9Shared 1Only OAKM 9

Largest allocation differences

XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP18.17% gap

18.17%0.000%

CVXCHEVRON CORP10.04% gap

10.04%0.000%

SHELSHELL PLC6.914% gap

6.914%0.000%

TTETOTALENERGIES5.054% gap

5.054%0.000%

PSXPhillips 664.352% gap

0.000%4.352%

TRGPTarga Resources Corp3.829% gap

0.000%3.829%

CCitigroup Inc3.720% gap

0.000%3.720%

CTVACorteva Inc3.437% gap

0.000%3.437%

Portfolio composition

Based on classified holdings in the returned results.

No classification data available.

Valuation multiples

Weighted valuation multiples by ETF
Weighted multiple	IXC	OAKM
P/E	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/B	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/S	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued

No valuation data available for these holdings.

Holdings details

View

Shared holdings

Sort by1

Ticker	Company	IXC weight	OAKM weight	Absolute difference
COP	CONOCOPHILLIPS	4.022%	5.228%	1.206%