Compare ETFs

Compare holdings, allocations, classifications, and performance.

Showing cached reports.

MTUM: generated Jul 31, 2026, 6:40 PM (as of 2026-07-30); FHLC: generated Aug 1, 2026, 3:25 PM (as of 2026-06-30).

Signed out: the comparison includes up to 10 holdings per ETF. Sign in to compare more holdings.

MTUM vs FHLC

Current snapshot · Current snapshot

Portfolio statistics

MTUM

Largest holding: MU · 6.256%
Top 10 concentration: 40.57%
Gross exposure: 40.57%
Net exposure: 40.57%

FHLC

Largest holding: LLY · 14.35%
Top 10 concentration: 52.39%
Gross exposure: 52.39%
Net exposure: 52.39%

Holdings overlap

Based on returned holdings.

ETF A

MTUM

Snapshot: 2026-07-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: MU · 6.256%

3.538%weighted overlap

ETF B

FHLC

Snapshot: 2026-06-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: LLY · 14.35%

Holdings universe19 distinct mapped tickers in the returned rows

1 shared

Only MTUM 9Shared 1Only FHLC 9

Largest allocation differences

LLYEli Lilly and Co14.35% gap

0.000%14.35%

ABBVAbbVie Inc6.530% gap

0.000%6.530%

MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC6.256% gap

6.256%0.000%

UNHUnitedHealth Group Inc5.540% gap

0.000%5.540%

JNJJOHNSON & JOHNSON5.512% gap

3.538%9.050%

AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC5.223% gap

5.223%0.000%

AVGOBROADCOM INC4.715% gap

4.715%0.000%

MRKMerck & Co Inc4.650% gap

0.000%4.650%

Portfolio composition

Based on classified holdings in the returned results.

No classification data available.

Valuation multiples

Weighted valuation multiples by ETF
Weighted multiple	MTUM	FHLC
P/E	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/B	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/S	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued

No valuation data available for these holdings.

Holdings details

View

Shared holdings

Sort by1

Ticker	Company	MTUM weight	FHLC weight	Absolute difference
JNJ	JOHNSON & JOHNSON	3.538%	9.050%	5.512%