Compare ETFs

Compare holdings, allocations, classifications, and performance.

Showing cached reports.

OIH: generated Jul 31, 2026, 12:43 PM (as of 2026-07-30); FTGS: generated Aug 1, 2026, 9:42 AM (as of 2026-07-31).

Signed out: the comparison includes up to 10 holdings per ETF. Sign in to compare more holdings.

OIH vs FTGS

Current snapshot · Current snapshot

Portfolio statistics

OIH

Largest holding: SLB · 19.79%
Top 10 concentration: 71.24%
Gross exposure: 71.24%
Net exposure: 71.24%

FTGS

Largest holding: MSFT · 2.310%
Top 10 concentration: 21.56%
Gross exposure: 21.56%
Net exposure: 21.56%

Holdings overlap

Based on returned holdings.

ETF A

OIH

Snapshot: 2026-07-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: SLB · 19.79%

2.110%weighted overlap

ETF B

FTGS

Snapshot: 2026-07-31
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: MSFT · 2.310%

Holdings universe19 distinct mapped tickers in the returned rows

1 shared

Only OIH 9Shared 1Only FTGS 9

Largest allocation differences

SLBSchlumberger Nv19.79% gap

19.79%0.000%

BKRBaker Hughes Co10.56% gap

12.67%2.110%

FTITechnipfmc Plc7.160% gap

7.160%0.000%

HALHalliburton Co5.950% gap

5.950%0.000%

TSTenaris Sa5.180% gap

5.180%0.000%

WFRDWeatherford International Plc4.370% gap

4.370%0.000%

NENoble Corp Plc4.360% gap

4.360%0.000%

RIGTransocean Ltd4.270% gap

4.270%0.000%

Portfolio composition

Based on classified holdings in the returned results.

No classification data available.

Valuation multiples

Weighted valuation multiples by ETF
Weighted multiple	OIH	FTGS
P/E	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/B	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/S	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued

No valuation data available for these holdings.

Holdings details

View

Shared holdings

Sort by1

Ticker	Company	OIH weight	FTGS weight	Absolute difference
BKR	Baker Hughes Co	12.67%	2.110%	10.56%