Compare ETFs

Compare holdings, allocations, classifications, and performance.

Showing cached reports.

SPHQ: generated Aug 1, 2026, 4:01 PM (as of 2026-04-30); COWG: generated Aug 1, 2026, 4:42 PM (as of 2026-04-30).

Signed out: the comparison includes up to 10 holdings per ETF. Sign in to compare more holdings.

SPHQ vs COWG

Historical snapshot · Historical snapshot

Portfolio statistics

SPHQ

Largest holding: COST · 4.809%
Top 10 concentration: 40.66%
Gross exposure: 40.66%
Net exposure: 40.66%

COWG

Largest holding: ONTO · 4.677%
Top 10 concentration: 28.28%
Gross exposure: 28.28%
Net exposure: 28.28%

Holdings overlap

Based on returned holdings.

ETF A

SPHQ

Snapshot: 2026-04-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: COST · 4.809%

4.090%weighted overlap

ETF B

COWG

Snapshot: 2026-04-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: ONTO · 4.677%

Holdings universe19 distinct mapped tickers in the returned rows

1 shared

Only SPHQ 9Shared 1Only COWG 9

Largest allocation differences

COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.4.809% gap

4.809%0.000%

VVisa Inc.4.682% gap

4.682%0.000%

ONTOOnto Innovation Inc4.677% gap

0.000%4.677%

AAPLApple Inc.4.501% gap

4.501%0.000%

MAMastercard Inc.4.316% gap

4.316%0.000%

GEGeneral Electric Co.4.156% gap

4.156%0.000%

CATCaterpillar Inc.3.776% gap

3.776%0.000%

CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.3.537% gap

3.537%0.000%

Portfolio composition

Based on classified holdings in the returned results.

No classification data available.

Valuation multiples

Weighted valuation multiples by ETF
Weighted multiple	SPHQ	COWG
P/E	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/B	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/S	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued

No valuation data available for these holdings.

Holdings details

View

Shared holdings

Sort by1

Ticker	Company	SPHQ weight	COWG weight	Absolute difference
LRCX	Lam Research Corp.	4.090%	4.435%	0.346%