Compare ETFs

Compare holdings, allocations, classifications, and performance.

Showing cached reports.

XLE: generated Aug 1, 2026, 5:03 AM (as of 2026-07-30); EAGL: generated Aug 1, 2026, 2:44 AM (as of 2026-03-31).

Signed out: the comparison includes up to 10 holdings per ETF. Sign in to compare more holdings.

XLE vs EAGL

Current snapshot · Historical snapshot

Portfolio statistics

XLE

Largest holding: XOM · 21.03%
Top 10 concentration: 73.41%
Gross exposure: 73.41%
Net exposure: 73.41%

EAGL

Largest holding: COP · 7.824%
Top 10 concentration: 53.53%
Gross exposure: 53.53%
Net exposure: 53.53%

Holdings overlap

Based on returned holdings.

ETF A

XLE

Snapshot: 2026-07-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: XOM · 21.03%

6.074%weighted overlap

ETF B

EAGL

Snapshot: 2026-03-31
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: COP · 7.824%

Holdings universe19 distinct mapped tickers in the returned rows

1 shared

Only XLE 9Shared 1Only EAGL 9

Largest allocation differences

XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP21.03% gap

21.03%0.000%

CVXCHEVRON CORP15.08% gap

15.08%0.000%

LSEGYLondon Stock Exchange Group PLC7.585% gap

0.000%7.585%

AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.7.184% gap

0.000%7.184%

TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.5.273% gap

0.000%5.273%

MPCMARATHON PETROLEUM CORP4.950% gap

4.950%0.000%

PSXPHILLIPS 664.943% gap

4.943%0.000%

VLOVALERO ENERGY CORP4.763% gap

4.763%0.000%

Portfolio composition

Based on classified holdings in the returned results.

No classification data available.

Valuation multiples

Weighted valuation multiples by ETF
Weighted multiple	XLE	EAGL
P/E	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/B	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/S	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued

No valuation data available for these holdings.

Holdings details

View

Shared holdings

Sort by1

Ticker	Company	XLE weight	EAGL weight	Absolute difference
COP	CONOCOPHILLIPS	6.074%	7.824%	1.750%