Compare ETFs

Compare holdings, allocations, classifications, and performance.

Showing cached reports.

XLE: generated Aug 1, 2026, 5:03 AM (as of 2026-07-30); OAKM: generated Aug 1, 2026, 8:13 AM (as of 2026-03-31).

Signed out: the comparison includes up to 10 holdings per ETF. Sign in to compare more holdings.

XLE vs OAKM

Current snapshot · Historical snapshot

Portfolio statistics

XLE

Largest holding: XOM · 21.03%
Top 10 concentration: 73.41%
Gross exposure: 73.41%
Net exposure: 73.41%

OAKM

Largest holding: COP · 5.228%
Top 10 concentration: 37.22%
Gross exposure: 37.22%
Net exposure: 37.22%

Holdings overlap

Based on returned holdings.

ETF A

XLE

Snapshot: 2026-07-30
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: XOM · 21.03%

9.580%weighted overlap

ETF B

OAKM

Snapshot: 2026-03-31
Returned holdings: 10
Largest position: COP · 5.228%

Holdings universe18 distinct mapped tickers in the returned rows

2 shared

Only XLE 8Shared 2Only OAKM 8

Largest allocation differences

XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP21.03% gap

21.03%0.000%

CVXCHEVRON CORP15.08% gap

15.08%0.000%

MPCMARATHON PETROLEUM CORP4.950% gap

4.950%0.000%

VLOVALERO ENERGY CORP4.763% gap

4.763%0.000%

EOGEOG RESOURCES INC4.506% gap

4.506%0.000%

SLBSLB LTD4.308% gap

4.308%0.000%

KMIKINDER MORGAN INC3.889% gap

3.889%0.000%

WMBWILLIAMS COS INC3.874% gap

3.874%0.000%

Portfolio composition

Based on classified holdings in the returned results.

No classification data available.

Valuation multiples

Weighted valuation multiples by ETF
Weighted multiple	XLE	OAKM
P/E	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/B	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued
P/S	N/A0/10 valued	N/A0/10 valued

No valuation data available for these holdings.

Holdings details

View

Shared holdings

Sort by2

Ticker	Company	XLE weight	OAKM weight	Absolute difference
COP	CONOCOPHILLIPS	6.074%	5.228%	0.846%
PSX	PHILLIPS 66	4.943%	4.352%	0.591%